|
Years ago I heard a banker say that if he had to choose
between managing an agricultural loan portfolio made up of 20 mid-sized farms
covering 10,000 acres or 5 large farms managing the same area, he would choose
the former. He admitted that only
dealing with the five could greatly simplify his workload and consolidate many
of his complex lines of oversight. But, if one of the twenty mid-sized farms
experienced a hardship other linked businesses and institutions like grain
elevators, seed and input dealers, even schools and churches could weather the
storm. On the other hand, if just one out of five large farms experienced a
failure, the shock could threaten the whole system.
As I see it, the banker was saying that one system was more
resilient, even though in terms of the economies of scale, the consolidated
model might have had some advantages. But in the interest of social and
economic stability, having more people and farms provided a better hedge
against collapse.
With an expanding global population, communities and nations
must face the question of which model suits their needs as erratic weather,
volatile markets, finite arable land and fresh water tightens the vice on the
global food system. Now that extreme
heat and drought are sweeping across my own farm and across more than 1,000
counties in 26 states, I’ve considered some of things that my neighbors do to
buffer the impacts of both environmental and economic shocks.
First, two miles to the south, Roman and
Ruth Miller used to only grow wheat, row crops, and cattle. About 15 years
ago, they took about a quarter of an acre out of conventional crop production,
and started a modest market garden. Since that time, the vegetable
production has expanded; they built several hoop houses to extend the
growing season; and with the assistance of their children, the Millers became
more and more adept at marketing. Roman still has wheat and cattle, but he has
created a side enterprise that has allowed him to become more profitable and
economically secure without having to buy more land or invest in more expensive
machinery. (The role of entrepreneurship and farm diversification is covered
well in work by Cornelia
and Jan Flora , and Karl Stauber ) Next, I think about my friend, Gene Albers, who farms about
30 miles from my operation. Gene incorporates cover
crops into his diversified crop and livestock operation. He believes that conserving soil is not
enough. A farmer should improve the soil
through building up organic matter and biological activity. By planting mixes
that might contain seeds of turnips, Japanese radishes, black oats, barley,
pearl millet, and Austrian peas, Gene can create ground covers that shade the
ground, penetrate compacted soil, and capture nitrogen. By grazing livestock on
crop residues and cover crops, Gene has been able to capture more value while
effectively recycling nutrients.
Finally, I think about my brother-in-law, Jamie Funke. Jamie
married the daughter of a farmer who taught vocational agriculture at the local
high school. Jamie also has a career in education working at the area community
college. He farms 320 acres of wheat, soybeans and grain sorghum in his spare
time. Like the majority of his neighbors and the majority of
American farmers , having an off-farm job allows Jamie to remain a productive
farmer with access to affordable insurance, and a steady source of cash flow.
Off- Farm Income/Work |
| 1930 30 percent of farmers worked off farm for an average of 100 days 1945 27 percent of farmers worked off farm 1970 54 percent of households had off-farm income 2002 93 percent of households had off-farm income
| |
Three farms. Three strategies for stability, resilience and
success. The Millers have concentrated on agricultural enterprise
diversification and entrepreneurship;
Albers focuses on building the health and productivity of the soil;
Funke has found that off-farm employment can better ensure his continued engaging
in farming.
Right now, we are all in our second year of severe drought –
a situation similar to the one plaguing rural people in the Sahel , and regions
in the Horn of Africa. The ramifications of the drought are different – people
in Africa face food emergencies and possible famine. However, my neighborhood examples provide
some element of what investing in resilience might look like regardless of
location .Each of my neighbors’ strategies holds some element of what investing
in resilience might look like regardless of location.
Facing the challenges of increased flooding, longer lasting
droughts, and volatile markets may mean that the monoculture, mega-farm will
not be the best target for emerging agriculture in the developing world. What may be the more stable and resilient
models could depend more upon investing in smaller operations that
enable entrepreneurship, off-farm income generation, and agro-ecological
strategies which build soil and conserve water.
This blog is written
by Jim French. He is a Reno County, KS farmer who works
on agriculture policy issues for Oxfam America.
New layer... |